Co-Parenting Red Flags: How Australian Family Courts Rate Your Behaviour

Shared parenting schedule showing custody changeover arrangements between separated parents

Co-parenting is rarely easy, and both parties often make mistakes, but these mistakes hold different weights in the Family Court of Australia. Some behaviours might only get a passing mention in a family report, while others can reshape an entire custody arrangement overnight.

What Changed in 2024

Most parents going through a separation don’t have a clear understanding of how their behaviour is assessed by the court, wrongly assuming that being a loving parent is enough.

That assumption became riskier in May 2024.

"(《世界人权宣言》) 2023 年家庭法修正案 replaced the old two-tier system of 15 considerations with a streamlined framework of six factors under section 60CC of the Family Law Act 1975. Safety now sits as the most important factor in co-parenting. 

The definition of “safety” explicitly includes psychological harm, coercive control and behaviour that damages a child’s relationship with the other parent.

There is also a catch-all element which encompasses: “anything else that is relevant to the particular circumstances of the child.” This includes your text messages, behaviour at changeovers and what you say about the other parent, even when you think your children can’t hear you.

The Numbers Behind Custody Disputes

According to the Australian Institute of Family Studies, around 3% of separated parents in Australia resolve their parenting arrangements through the court system. The vast majority are able to work things out either between themselves or through mediation.

But that 3% are the most complex, and often emotionally-charged, cases. AIFS research shows that 85% of families who go to court report emotional abuse, while 54% involve physical violence. These are not amicable separations.

When parents find themselves in this difficult situation, the Family Report Writer is one of the most influential people in the entire process. A Family Report Writer is a registered psychologist or qualified social worker who has a minimum of five years’ experience working with children and families. 

Their role involves interviewing each parent and the children separately (i.e. away from parents), and producing a written report with recommendations for the court.

"(《世界人权宣言》) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia’s final decisions are “generally consistent with the report writers’ recommendations.” This means that a bad family report is incredibly difficult to overcome.

With that in mind, here is a deep dive into how Australian family courts view five common co-parenting behaviours.

@kingsford.lawyers Family lawyer rates behaviours that lose you child custody. You won't believe the worst one 👀⚖️ Remember courts are seeing everything and small behaviours add up. Courts don't just look at one incident, they look at patterns over months. Every late pickup, every coached answer, every "forgotten" school event gets documented. What do you think is the worst custody mistake? Drop it below 👇 #CustodyBattle #ParentingOrders #FamilyLawActAustralia #KingsfordLawyers ♬ original sound - Kingsford Lawyers

Using Your Children as Messengers

Court severity: low, but cumulative

Making your eight-year-old “ask Dad if he’s going to pay the school fees” might seem harmless, but the court sees it very differently.

Under section 60CC(2)(c) of the Family Law Act 1975, courts must consider the child’s developmental, psychological and emotional needs. Placing children in the middle of an adult conflict forces them to deal with emotions they are not equipped to handle.

Family Report Writers treat this behaviour as evidence of poor boundaries and an inability to separate parental relationships from co-parenting ones. A single instance of this behaviour is unlikely to affect a case, but a documented pattern is a signal to the court about a parent’s capacity to prioritise their child’s well-being over their own conflict.

The practical risk: using children as messengers appears in the family report and chips away at credibility on more serious issues.

Running Late for Changeovers

Court severity: moderate, and be escalated

Being late occasionally is unlikely to concern a judge too much, but a consistent pattern of deliberate or careless lateness is treated as a contravention of parenting orders under the Family Law Act 1975, which defines a contravention as an intentional failure to comply with a parenting order without a reasonable attempt to comply, and without reasonable excuse. 

A parent who is consistently late is showing that they do not respect the order, the time of their co-parent or their children’s well-being. In these instances, the court can order make-up time for the other parent, impose costs orders, require a bond, give the offending parent community service, impose fines and, in extreme cases, order imprisonment for up to 12 months.

"(《世界人权宣言》) Federal Circuit and Family Court established a dedicated National Contravention List in September 2021 to help deal with the volume of breach applications. This should be a clear signal of how seriously the system treats non-compliance.

"(《世界人权宣言》) AIFS found that more than 25% of contravention cases involved litigation extending over three to four years, while another 33% extended over five to nine years. Chronic lateness can quickly end up becoming years of costly legal conflict.

Coaching Your Children Before a Family Report

Court severity: high

Many parents make critical errors when it comes to this. Telling your child what to say to a Family Report Writer, or even rehearsing responses before their interview, can end up destroying your case.

Family Report Writers are trained to spot a child who has been coached. Children are interviewed separately from their parents, in age-appropriate settings, and techniques specifically designed to identify when a child’s expressed views are their own and when they are using a script are used.

If coaching is suspected or identified, it will be called out explicitly in the report, and is a clear sign to the judge that you are willing to manipulate your own child for an advantage.

Under the new section 60CC framework, courts take the child’s views into consideration, but if those views have been tainted by coaching, they will be dismissed entirely. In fact, the coaching itself becomes evidence that the child’s psychological well-being has been compromised.

The 2023 amendments also introduced a new accountability framework for Family Report Writers, which includes accreditation standards and processes for handling complaints. Report writers themselves now face increased scrutiny, so they’re more diligent about documenting parental interference than ever before.

Making False Allegations of Abuse

Court severity: very high

If it is determined that abuse allegations were invented for tactical reasons, it fundamentally undermines that parent’s credibility on every other issue in the case.

This does not mean legitimate safety concerns should go unreported, however. The new section 60CC(2)(a) always puts safety first, and section 60CC(2A) requires the court to strongly consider any history of family violence, abuse or neglect in every decision they make.

Fabricated allegations are treated very harshly. In one particularly shocking case, a mother made unsubstantiated sexual abuse allegations against the father. When medical examinations did not support these claims, the judge declared that the child needed to be “protected from the continued likely escalation of that emotional manipulation and harm” and gave custody to the father.

AIFS research on allegations in family law found it was “not possible to assess the extent to which allegations had been fully or partially fabricated.” There is a common perception of widespread false allegations. Indeed, a survey found that 46% of the public believed women often fabricate domestic violence claims in custody cases. Judicial professionals, who have the most direct insight, do not share that view.

The takeaway: genuine concerns should be voiced through proper legal channels at the earliest opportunity, but fabricating allegations will cost you your credibility and potentially your case.

Child's crayon drawing labelled Mum's House and Dad's House pinned to a fridge beside a printed parenting schedule

Relocating Without Court Approval

Court severity: the most serious

Moving your children without the other parent’s consent or a court order will result in the severest legal consequences under Australian family law.

Section 67Q of the Family Law Act gives the court the power to issue recovery orders. These orders allow the use of force if necessary, as well as give the police the right to stop and search vehicles, and enter and search premises. They also allow warrantless arrest of anyone who violates restrictions on removing the child.

Taking a child out of Australia without consent or a court order when a parenting order exists is a criminal offence.

If you want to move and the other parent disagrees with the idea, the only safe path to a resolution is through the court. In Cunningham & Foster [2024], a mother was permitted to relocate from NSW to Queensland with her nine-year-old because the court determined it was in the child’s best interests. Following the proper legal process is what saw her succeed.

What You Can Do to Protect Your Position

The 2024 amendments simplified the court’s approach while raising the bar for parental behaviour. The six-factor framework under section 60CC puts safety first and gives judges broad discretion to consider anything and everything relevant to the child’s circumstances when making a decision.

Here is what that means in practice.

Communication

  • Use a co-parenting app (OurFamilyWizard, 2Houses, or similar) for all communication with the other parent. These apps create a timestamped, admissible record.
  • Keep children out of adult conversations altogether. If your child asks about money, school decisions or “why Mum said that,” redirect them gently and deal with it through proper channels.
  • Save every text message, email and written exchange. If a dispute ends up in court, the parent with better records will be in a stronger position.

另请阅读 我的前夫能阻止我更改孩子的姓氏吗?

Changeovers and Compliance

  • Follow parenting orders exactly as written. If the order says 4pm Saturday, be there at 4pm Saturday.
  • Document every changeover. A brief note of the time, location and any issues which arise should be enough.
  • If your circumstances change and the order no longer fits into your life, you can apply to adjust it through the court. Never take matters into your own hands.

Family Reports

  • Be completely honest with the Family Report Writer. They are well-trained to identify rehearsed or coached responses.
  • Never coach your children before their interview. It will likely be identified and used against you.
  • Focus on demonstrating your capacity as a parent, not criticising your ex-partner.

Safety Concerns

  • If you have genuine concerns about your child’s safety, raise them through proper legal channels as soon as possible.
  • Do not conceal safety concerns as a tactical tool for later use. Courts view this as evidence that the concern may not be genuine.
  • If a situation is urgent, contact the police first.

Before Making Big Decisions

  • Before making any significant change involving your children (moving house, changing schools, introducing a new partner, altering living arrangements, etc.), seek proper legal advice first.
  • A free chat with a family lawyer can clarify your legal position and prevent a common mistake from becoming a protracted legal problem.

Questions to Ask Yourself

If you are currently in a co-parenting arrangement, consider whether any of these apply to you:

  • Have you made negative comments about the other parent within earshot of your children?
  • Have you been consistently late or inflexible with changeovers?
  • Have you posted anything about your custody situation on social media?
  • Have you told your children what they should say to a counsellor, report writer or the other parent?
  • Have you withheld contact or changed arrangements without agreement or a court order?

If any of these apply to you, it does not mean your case is lost; it means that getting advice now is better than waiting until the other parent raises it in court.

The Bigger Picture

The Family Court’s purpose is not to punish parents; it’s designed to determine what arrangement best serves the child. Keep in mind that the court pays very close attention to how parents behave during the process, because parenting behaviour during separation is one of the strongest indicators of parenting capacity going forward.

Not every mistake will cost you your case, but the parents who lose ground are almost always the ones who underestimate how seriously the court takes what they do.

Going Through a Co-Parenting Dispute?

Whether you are working through a co-parenting arrangement, dealing with a contravention application or concerned about your child’s well-being during separation, getting family law advice at the earliest opportunity can make a significant difference.

Kingsford Lawyers’ family law team on the Gold Coast works with clients across Australia on custody disputes, co-parenting arrangements and parenting orders. Contact us online or call 1300 244 342 进行保密、免责交谈.

分享这篇文章

在 Facebook 上
推特
LinkedIn
电子邮件

最新文章

How do Australian family courts rate your co-parenting behaviour? From minor red flags to case-ending mistakes, here's what judges actually look for.

Five custody mistakes most parents don't take seriously, until a family court judge uses their behaviour against them. Learn about what the court actually looks for.

A mum gets the career opportunity of a lifetime. A dad refuses to let his children leave the country. A court has …

我们能提供哪些帮助?

如欲与金斯福德律师就您的案件进行交流,请致电
1300 244 342 for a confidential, obligation-free chat.

WE SPEAK – ENGLISH, ITALIAN, MANDARIN, FINNISH, PORTUGUESE, RUSSIAN, BENGALI, HINDI, URDU, GREEK, AFRIKAANS AND PUNJABI

author avatar
Stefanie Fontana Special Counsel
Stefanie Fontana is a Special Counsel at Kingsford Lawyers with a Master's in Family Law and over 15 years of experience in insolvency law. She is a passionate family law advocate and community contributor who speaks English and Italian.
zh_CN简体中文

预约咨询

立即与我们的律师预约免费咨询并获得 $500 积分

请联系我们,让我们共同努力,找到一个能让您安心并积极向前迈进的解决方案。

您是如何知道我们的?

条款和条件适用