Many parents assume a child can simply "decide" at age 12 or 14. Under Australian family law, there is no such threshold. Here is what courts actually weigh, and when a child's preference starts to carry real weight.
By the time many employees realise a line has been crossed, it’s already too late.
So how can we prepare ourselves better and see the line before it’s even been drawn? We asked an employment lawyer to rate five of the worst boss moves by how illegal they actually are, from just a bit dodgy to flat-out criminal. Some of the scores might surprise you.
If you’re an employee and suffering through any of these right now, you might be wondering, ‘Is this a fair way to dismiss someone?’ and ‘Can I still do something about it?’
If you are an employer, take careful notes: these are the moves you should not make to avoid an unfair dismissal claim being slammed down on your desk.
Let’s dig right into the first: ‘Watching your screen without telling you’.
Watch the full breakdown here, where our employment lawyer, Stafanie Fontana, rates each boss move one by one:
A boss who installs monitoring software that tracks your screen, your keystrokes or your location, without telling you, is definitely overstepping the mark. This is a serious breach of your rights. However, in terms of legality, on its own, it’s one of the mildest things on this list and here’s why.
Queensland doesn’t actually have a standalone workplace surveillance law. That means an employer can generally monitor a work computer, work email and internet use, as long as the employee has been made aware that it’s going on.
The real limits sit around the more invasive stuff. Under the Invasion of Privacy Act 1971 (Qld), your boss can’t, for example, secretly use a listening device to record your private conversations. Watching your screen is one thing, but bugging your conversations or filming you in private is another thing altogether.
So why does it still make the list? Because monitoring rarely shows up on its own. When a boss is quietly building an evidence file on someone, it’s often the opening move in a bigger push to manage them out. On its own, it’s a 3, but a huge red flag.
Imagine you take a long period of parental leave. When you return to work, you notice that your role, your responsibilities, have quietly shrunk and it feels like you’re the last person to know.
As parental leave is a protected workplace right, this one jumps up the scale a few numbers without much effort at all. The Fair Work Act gives you the right to return to the same position you held before you went on leave. If that job genuinely no longer exists, there are strict rules the employer has to follow. Simply saying ‘We reshuffled while you were away’ is not good enough.
If your employer changes the role you return to without consulting you, they may be engaging in adverse action. That’s to say, an employer taking action against an employee for a reason that’s prohibited by law. In this situation, you could have grounds for an unfair dismissal claim.
A clause that says you can’t work in your industry for 18 months after you leave sounds terrifying on paper. In practice, it’s only enforceable to the extent a court says it is.
Restraint of trade clauses are legally binding only in so far as they’re reasonable. They usually only protect something the business is genuinely entitled to protect, like confidential information or established client relationships. An 18-month, industry-wide ban is long, and the broader the restraint, the harder it is to defend in court.
However, there’s a change coming. In March 2025, the federal government announced plans to ban non-compete clauses for most workers earning under the high-income threshold, with the reform targeted to start in 2027. Until it lands, the reasonableness test is what decides whether a clause like this holds up.
Genuine redundancy is lawful. If a role truly isn’t needed anymore and the employer follows the right process, letting someone go isn’t considered unfair dismissal.
It’s really the timing here that sets off alarms. Raise a bullying complaint on Monday and get told you’re up for redundancy on Friday, and the whole thing starts to look a little sketchy. But remember, making a complaint about your treatment at work is itself a protected workplace right.
Importantly, in an adverse action claim, once you’ve shown the basics, the burden of proof flips. The employer now has to prove the redundancy had nothing to do with your complaint.
Yes, that 10 out of 10 is justified here. This really is the worst of them all.
Some employers believe that if they make life unbearable enough, you’ll quit, and a resignation means you can no longer submit an unfair dismissal claim. Thankfully, it doesn’t work like that. The law treats a forced resignation and being fired as basically the same thing.
If an employer deliberately makes your working life so intolerable that you feel you have no real choice but to leave, you may have a constructive dismissal claim.
Here are a few ‘intolerable’ actions that, if they’re taken, might mean your boss is pressuring you to quit:
To lodge an unfair dismissal claim with the 公平工作委员会, you generally have 21 calendar days from the day your dismissal takes effect (weekends and holidays count).
It’s a tight deadline, and it’s the single most common reason people miss out.
A few other things may shape whether you can claim:
If you’re unsure whether your employer’s actions were lawful, we can help. Kingsford Lawyers advises and represents employees across Australia, from assessing your options to pursuing claims before the Fair Work Commission. With offices in Melbourne and on the Gold Coast, we’re here to help wherever you’re based.
Book a free consultation by calling 1300 244 342. No obligation, no pressure, just a straight answer on whether you have a claim.
Many parents assume a child can simply "decide" at age 12 or 14. Under Australian family law, there is no such threshold. Here is what courts actually weigh, and when a child's preference starts to carry real weight.
Many parents assume a child can simply "decide" at age 12 or 14. Under Australian family law, there is no such threshold. Here is what courts actually weigh, and when a child's preference starts to carry real weight.
Victoria's proposed right to request 2 WFH days a week, what employees and employers need to know.
WE SPEAK – ENGLISH, ITALIAN, MANDARIN, FINNISH, PORTUGUESE, RUSSIAN, BENGALI, HINDI, URDU, GREEK, AFRIKAANS, SPANISH, ARABIC AND PUNJABI
请联系我们,让我们共同努力,找到一个能让您安心并积极向前迈进的解决方案。