Navigating a de facto breakup involves intricate legal considerations, particularly concerning asset division and financial support entitlements. At Kingsford Lawyers, our dedicated …
In Australia, employees benefit from legal protections designed to shield them from unjust terminations. Should you suspect that your dismissal was unfair, you might be eligible to lodge an unfair dismissal claim. This article offers a comprehensive outline of the procedure, encompassing pivotal stages, legal aspects, and the Fair Work Commission’s involvement.
People can experience employment issues for many reasons, most commonly we find these issues relate to the:
An unfair dismissal claim must be lodged with the Fair Work Commission within 21 days of the dismissal.
To make a claim you must satisfy the following criteria:
Before pursuing an unfair dismissal claim, it’s crucial to ascertain whether you meet the eligibility criteria outlined in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). These criteria encompass:
According to the Fair Work Act 2009, employers are permitted to terminate an employment contract under the following circumstances:
Â
An employee is deemed to have been unfairly terminated if Fair Work Australia determines that the termination was indeed harsh, unjust, and unreasonable, or if it was not a genuine redundancy.
Under the Fair Dismissal Code, employees working for small business employers cannot lodge a claim for unfair termination within the first 12 months of employment. Conversely, employees of larger business employers can file a claim after completing 6 months of employment.
To initiate the unfair dismissal procedure, you’ll need to submit an application to the Fair Work Commission, which can be accessed through their website. While seeking legal advice before completing the form is advisable, you have the option to lodge the application independently. Key details to include in the application form are:
When it comes to resolving disputes over unfair dismissal, employees often find themselves at a crossroads between two critical stages: conciliation and formal hearing. Both avenues offer distinct approaches to addressing grievances, each with its own set of advantages and considerations.
Conciliation, as the initial step, embodies a collaborative effort to find common ground between the employee and the employer. Facilitated by a neutral conciliator, this process encourages open dialogue and negotiation, aiming to reach a mutually acceptable resolution. Here, the emphasis lies on communication, understanding, and flexibility. Employees have the opportunity to voice their concerns, express their desired outcomes, and explore potential solutions. Employers, likewise, are encouraged to engage constructively, considering the implications of the dismissal and the possibility of finding amicable solutions. While the conciliator does not have decision-making authority, their role in guiding discussions and fostering compromise is pivotal.
On the other hand, the formal hearing represents a more structured and adversarial approach to dispute resolution. Here, both parties present their respective cases before the Fair Work Commission, relying on evidence, witness testimonies, and legal arguments to support their positions. Unlike conciliation, the formal hearing is bound by procedural rules and legal standards, with a focus on the impartial assessment of evidence and application of relevant laws. For employees, the formal hearing offers the opportunity to present a comprehensive case, backed by compelling evidence and legal arguments. It provides a platform for asserting their rights and seeking redress for unjust treatment. However, the formal nature of the process also entails greater complexity and formality, requiring thorough preparation and adherence to legal requirements.
In terms of outcomes, conciliation offers the prospect of a swift and mutually satisfactory resolution, without the need for protracted legal proceedings. It prioritises cooperation and compromise, potentially preserving working relationships and mitigating the emotional toll of prolonged conflict. Conversely, the formal hearing provides a forum for a thorough examination of the facts and legal principles, culminating in a decision by the Fair Work Commission. While the process may be more time-consuming and resource-intensive, it offers a definitive resolution and the opportunity for legal remedies such as reinstatement or compensation.
Ultimately, the choice between conciliation and formal hearing depends on various factors, including the nature of the dispute, the parties’ willingness to engage in negotiations, and the desired outcome. While conciliation emphasises cooperation and flexibility, the formal hearing ensures a rigorous examination of the case within a legal framework. Whichever path is chosen, seeking timely legal advice and representation can help navigate the complexities of the process and ensure the protection of one’s rights and interests.
For any or the issues listed above or for any other issue feel free to contact us today at 1300 244 342 or send us an email at admin@kingsfordlawyers.com.au and one of our employment lawyer would be happy to help.
Navigating a de facto breakup involves intricate legal considerations, particularly concerning asset division and financial support entitlements. At Kingsford Lawyers, our dedicated …
As the holiday season approaches, families come together to celebrate and create lasting memories. For divorced or separated parents, co-parenting during Christmas …
Navigating life post-divorce can be complex, and when it involves children, decisions regarding their well-being require careful consideration, especially when it comes …
55 Hudsons Road, Spotswood VIC 3015
2 Currumburra Road, Ashmore Qld 4214
E-13, UPSIDC, Site-IV, Greater Noida India
343791 York House, Green Lane West,
Preston PR2 1XB
© Copyright 2024 KINGSFORD LAWYERS | ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Reach out to us, and let’s work together towards a solution that brings you peace of mind and a positive step forward.
